Power Quality Solutions for Transmission & Distribution

CHITEK provides reactive support and harmonic control for utility and distribution networks using SVG for voltage and power factor, and AHF where industrial or traction loads inject harmonics. Distributed generation, long feeders and EV clusters each stress the network differently, so ratings are set from measurements at the point of common coupling.

Transmission and distribution networks carry the combined effect of everything downstream: industrial harmonics, traction unbalance, distributed generation and long-line reactive loss. The usual CHITEK arrangement is an SVG on the busbar for voltage and reactive support, with AHF on the feeders that carry the worst harmonic load.

Reviewed by the CHITEK power quality engineering team · Last updated

AHF or SVG on a distribution network?

On utility and distribution networks the two devices address different network constraints, and both are normally specified together at the planning stage.

Aspect AHF (Active Harmonic Filter) SVG (Static Var Generator)
What it does Injects a compensating current that cancels the harmonic current drawn by non-linear loads. Supplies or absorbs reactive power continuously to hold power factor and support voltage.
Primary target Current distortion (THDi) and harmonic spectrum at the point of common coupling. Power factor, voltage fluctuation and reactive demand across the load cycle.
Typical trigger VFD banks, rectifiers, welding sets, induction furnaces, LED drivers, UPS rectifiers. Low or swinging power factor, voltage sag and rise, weak or long feeders, EV load steps.
Behaviour at light load Compensation scales with the measured harmonic current, so output falls as load falls. Holds output as required to reach the target power factor even at near-zero active load.
Use in this sector Harmonic correction at feeders where industrial or traction loads inject distortion into the network. Reactive support and voltage control on long feeders, at DG tie-points and at EV charging clusters.

Network studies set the targets; the equipment ratings follow from the study rather than from a template.

Typical power quality problems

Transmission & Distribution

Substation / Distribution / Rural Upgrade

Nonlinear Load

Harmonic Injection from industrial & traction loads

>10%

THD

  • Transformer Overheat — Excess harmonic loss, insulation aging, forced derating up to 30% capacity
  • Protection Misoperation — Relay false trip, breaker nuisance operation, grid reliability degradation

Distributed Gen

Grid Disturbance from DG interconnection

±10%

Voltage Fluct.

  • Reverse Power Flow — DG backfeed causes voltage rise, tap changer hunting, protection coordination failure
  • Islanding Risk — Unintentional island formation, out-of-sync reconnection, equipment damage

Line Reactive

Long-distance transfer reactive loss

< 0.9

End V (pu)

  • Line Loss Surge — I²R loss exponential increase, rural feeder end-voltage collapse, load shedding
  • Voltage Collapse Risk — Reactive deficit cascade, wide-area blackout potential, N-1 contingency failure

Urban Distribution Network

City Center / Development Zone / Old Residential

EV Charging

Impact surge from fast-charging clusters

120kW+

Load Step

  • Grid Sag — Concurrent charging peak causes 15%+ voltage dip, distribution transformer overload trip
  • Harmonic Injection — EV rectifier 6-pulse harmonics, THD exceeding 8% at PCC, grid pollution

Commercial Load

Phase imbalance from single-phase loads

>8%

Unbalance

  • Neutral Overload — Zero-sequence current accumulation, N-line burnout, fire hazard in old residential areas
  • Motor Derating — Negative-sequence heating in 3-phase motors, shortened service life, unplanned outage

Cable Network

Capacitive reactive from underground cables

Leading

PF > 0.95

  • Over-compensation — Cable capacitance causes leading PF at light load, voltage rise, insulation stress
  • Resonance Risk — Cable capacitance + transformer inductance parallel resonance, harmonic amplification

Microgrid & CCHP

Campus / Island / Remote Area

Multi-source Grid

Harmonic stacking from PV + wind + storage

>12%

THD

  • PCC Violation — Multi-inverter harmonic superposition, IEEE 519 PCC limit exceeded, grid operator penalty
  • Resonance Instability — LCL filter interaction, wideband oscillation, inverter cascade trip

Storage Cycling

Reactive fluctuation from charge/discharge

PF Swing

0.7~1.0

  • Penalty Charge — Bidirectional PF swing triggers utility reactive energy billing, monthly cost surge
  • Cycle Life Loss — Excess reactive current heats battery PCS, accelerated IGBT aging, warranty void risk

Grid Switching

Voltage sag during island/grid transition

>20%

Sag Depth

  • Load Trip — STS transfer > 4ms causes contactor dropout, critical load UPS transfer to battery
  • Diesel Start Fail — Sag during generator start sequence, AVR excitation collapse, black-start failure

Power Grid case studies

Each case below is written up the same way: what the site was, what the survey measured before anything was specified, what was installed, and what the acceptance test showed afterwards. Projects marked Typical Configuration are illustrative — sizing for those always starts from a site survey rather than from the table.

Typical Configuration — Transmission & Distribution Reactive Support

Typical Configuration · Power Grid

Typical Configuration — Transmission & Distribution Reactive Support

Illustrative configuration — sizing starts from a site power-quality survey

Background

An illustrative arrangement for a substation or rural feeder upgrade: SVG on the 35 kV / 10 kV busbar for reactive and voltage support, with AHF placed only on the feeders carrying the worst harmonic load.

Equipment installed

  • SVG
    SVG × 2 units Static Var Generator Busbar reactive voltage support
  • AHF-200A
    AHF-200A × 3 units Active Harmonic Filter Critical feeder harmonic filtering

Project overview

For substations serving a mix of industrial and traction load, the usual arrangement is an SVG on the busbar for reactive voltage support plus AHF on the critical feeders for harmonics. Ratings are set by a survey, not by a template — the quantities below are a starting point only.

Why there is no before / after here

Illustrative configuration — not a specific delivered project. Reference projects in this sector are available on request.

Key results

  • Sized from a measured harmonic spectrum and reactive profile
  • Designed to GB/T 14549 limits at the point of common coupling
  • Ask us for reference projects in transmission and distribution

Frequently asked questions

Where do SVG and AHF go in a substation?

SVG on the busbar for reactive voltage support, AHF on the specific feeders with the highest harmonic load. Treating an entire station for harmonics is rarely economic.

What causes end-of-line voltage collapse on rural feeders?

Reactive loss over a long line. As current rises, both the resistive and the reactive drop grow, and the voltage at the far end falls out of the usable band. Reactive support near the load end is usually more effective than raising the source voltage.

Does distributed generation change the power quality picture?

Yes. Reverse power flow raises voltage at the connection point and inverters add switching harmonics. Protection coordination and tap changer behaviour both need rechecking when DG capacity grows.

Can an underground cable network be over-compensated?

Yes. Cable capacitance generates reactive power at light load and can push the measured power factor leading, which raises voltage and stresses insulation. It also creates a parallel resonance risk with the transformer inductance.

Related products

Solutions for other industries

Get a power quality assessment for your site

Every project on this page started with a measured survey. Send us your single-line diagram and load list and we will tell you what we would measure first.

Contact our engineers